Site code modification via forged settings request
Published Jun 10, 2024 · Updated Aug 19, 2024
Cross-site request forgery in BOSSCMS-Plus 3.10 allows attackers to change site header or footer code through an administrator's browser. The code-settings endpoint accepts an auto-submitted multipart POST that writes attacker-chosen head_code and foot_code values under the administrator's session. An administrator must visit attacker-controlled HTML while signed in; the resulting setting change can place persistent script content in rendered pages.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in BOSSCMS-Plus 3.10 allows attackers to change site header or footer code through an administrator's browser. The code-settings endpoint accepts an auto-submitted multipart POST that writes attacker-chosen head_code and foot_code values under the administrator's session. An administrator must visit attacker-controlled HTML while signed in; the resulting setting change can place persistent script content in rendered pages.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-31613
- Published
- Jun 10, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 19, 2024
- Vendor
- Wenzhou Ruanjie Network Technology Co., Ltd.
- Product
- BOSSCMS-Plus
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 10, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 19, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- BOSSCMS CSRF proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo