Unauthenticated log disclosure via predictable filename
Published Apr 10, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Sensitive information exposure in FG Drupal to WordPress 3.70.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to read migration logs without authentication. The plugin writes migration output to a web-accessible log file under a predictable name, allowing unauthenticated requests to locate and retrieve it. The affected site must retain a generated log; the reported consequence is disclosure only, with no integrity or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
Sensitive information exposure in FG Drupal to WordPress 3.70.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to read migration logs without authentication. The plugin writes migration output to a web-accessible log file under a predictable name, allowing unauthenticated requests to locate and retrieve it. The affected site must retain a generated log; the reported consequence is disclosure only, with no integrity or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-31247
- Published
- Apr 10, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Frédéric GILLES
- Product
- FG Drupal to WordPress
- Classifications
- CWE-532, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 10, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.70.3
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=3.70.3 changes=[{"at":"3.71.0","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo