Campaign deletion via missing nonce validation
Published Apr 26, 2024 · Updated Oct 28, 2024
Cross-site request forgery on the enl-campaigns page in ENL Newsletter 1.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete campaigns. The page accepts a campaign-deletion request without valid WordPress nonce verification, so a forged request runs under an administrator's authenticated session. Exploitation requires a logged-in administrator to follow an attacker-controlled link or otherwise submit the request, and the bounded impact is deletion of selected newsletter campaigns.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery on the enl-campaigns page in ENL Newsletter 1.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete campaigns. The page accepts a campaign-deletion request without valid WordPress nonce verification, so a forged request runs under an administrator's authenticated session. Exploitation requires a logged-in administrator to follow an attacker-controlled link or otherwise submit the request, and the bounded impact is deletion of selected newsletter campaigns.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-3059
- Published
- Apr 26, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 28, 2024
- Vendor
- ENL Newsletter Plugin Project
- Product
- ENL Newsletter
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 26, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 28, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=*
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.0.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- WPScan CSRF proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo