Document-triggered crash via unchecked font-parameter copies
Published Jul 3, 2024 · Updated Dec 3, 2024
Stack-based buffer overflow in Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.0 allows attackers to crash the interpreter with crafted input. In pdfi_open_CIDFont_substitute_file, unchecked memcpy calls copy oversized CIDFSubstPath or CIDFSubstFont values into a fixed 4096-byte fontfname stack buffer. Exploitation requires processing attacker-controlled PostScript that invokes the PDF interpreter with Type0 font substitution, and the demonstrated impact is a process crash.
Summary
What happened
Stack-based buffer overflow in Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.0 allows attackers to crash the interpreter with crafted input. In pdfi_open_CIDFont_substitute_file, unchecked memcpy calls copy oversized CIDFSubstPath or CIDFSubstFont values into a fixed 4096-byte fontfname stack buffer. Exploitation requires processing attacker-controlled PostScript that invokes the PDF interpreter with Type0 font substitution, and the demonstrated impact is a process crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-29507
- Published
- Jul 3, 2024
- Updated
- Dec 3, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-120, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 3, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 3, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- CIDFSubstPath stack-overflow proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo