Unauthorized member bans via missing permission check
Published Jul 11, 2024 · Updated Sep 17, 2024
Access control flaw in GitLab 16.5 through 16.11.5, 17.0 through 17.0.3, and 17.1 through 17.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to ban members. The group-member ban endpoint accepts a backend request from a Guest with the admin_group_member custom permission without enforcing the Owner-only authorization required for that action. A group owner must first assign the custom permission; exploitation then lets the lower-privileged account block even higher-privileged members from the group and its resources.
Summary
What happened
Access control flaw in GitLab 16.5 through 16.11.5, 17.0 through 17.0.3, and 17.1 through 17.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to ban members. The group-member ban endpoint accepts a backend request from a Guest with the admin_group_member custom permission without enforcing the Owner-only authorization required for that action. A group owner must first assign the custom permission; exploitation then lets the lower-privileged account block even higher-privileged members from the group and its resources.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-2880
- Published
- Jul 11, 2024
- Updated
- Sep 17, 2024
- Vendor
- GitLab
- Product
- GitLab
- Classifications
- CWE-284, T1531
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 11, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 17, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=16.5 <16.11.6
- Affected versionversion=17.0 <17.0.4
- Affected versionversion=17.1 <17.1.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Group-member ban request proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo