Log-message disclosure via unintended client forwarding
Published May 14, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Information disclosure in Siemens RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW before 5.5 allows remote attackers to receive log messages at a compromised client. Siemens states that affected systems forward logs to a designated client under certain circumstances, but it does not disclose the component, trigger, or validation error responsible. No authentication or user interaction is required; exposure is limited to log-message confidentiality, with no reported data alteration or service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Information disclosure in Siemens RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW before 5.5 allows remote attackers to receive log messages at a compromised client. Siemens states that affected systems forward logs to a designated client under certain circumstances, but it does not disclose the component, trigger, or validation error responsible. No authentication or user interaction is required; exposure is limited to log-message confidentiality, with no reported data alteration or service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-27947
- Published
- May 14, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Siemens
- Product
- RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW
- Classifications
- CWE-200
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 14, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <V5.5
- Affected versionversion=- <5.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo