Router crash via unchecked ApCliSsid copy
Published Mar 1, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Stack overflow in Shenzhen Libituo LBT-T300-T390 firmware 2.2.1.8 allows remote authenticated users to crash the router via HTTP. Within the Rc program's updateCurAPlist function, an ApCliSsid value read through nvram_get is copied by strcpy without bounds checking and then formatted by sprintf into stack buffers. The published request targets /apply.cgi with Basic administrator credentials; overflowing the buffers interrupts router service.
Summary
What happened
Stack overflow in Shenzhen Libituo LBT-T300-T390 firmware 2.2.1.8 allows remote authenticated users to crash the router via HTTP. Within the Rc program's updateCurAPlist function, an ApCliSsid value read through nvram_get is copied by strcpy without bounds checking and then formatted by sprintf into stack buffers. The published request targets /apply.cgi with Basic administrator credentials; overflowing the buffers interrupts router service.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-27572
- Published
- Mar 1, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd.
- Product
- LBT-T300-T390 Firmware
- Classifications
- CWE-120, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 1, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.2.1.8
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- updateCurAPlist crafted POST requestproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo