Authenticated code execution via check_email stack overflow
Published May 21, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Stack-based buffer overflow in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero 5.1.x allows remote authenticated users to execute code via network requests. The check_email function, reached through the share_file and send_share_mail actions of utilRequest.cgi, copies attacker-controlled input into a stack buffer without checking its length. A valid NAS account is required; successful corruption redirects control flow and runs code in the CGI process context.
Summary
What happened
Stack-based buffer overflow in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero 5.1.x allows remote authenticated users to execute code via network requests. The check_email function, reached through the share_file and send_share_mail actions of utilRequest.cgi, copies attacker-controlled input into a stack buffer without checking its length. A valid NAS account is required; successful corruption redirects control flow and runs code in the CGI process context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-27128
- Published
- May 21, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Linn Products Limited
- Product
- QuTS hero
- Classifications
- CWE-120, CWE-121, CAPEC-100, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 21, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=h5.1.x
- Affected versionversion=h5.1.x <h5.1.7.2770 build 20240520
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo