Contributor-level stored cross-site scripting
Published Mar 27, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in VeronaLabs WP SMS 6.3.4 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts into WordPress pages. Neither the CNA record nor its referenced advisory identifies the input field, storage path, or exact sanitization or output-escaping failure. Contributor-level access and a privileged user's interaction are required; successful exploitation runs attacker-controlled script in that user's browser context.
Summary
What happened
Stored cross-site scripting in VeronaLabs WP SMS 6.3.4 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts into WordPress pages. Neither the CNA record nor its referenced advisory identifies the input field, storage path, or exact sanitization or output-escaping failure. Contributor-level access and a privileged user's interaction are required; successful exploitation runs attacker-controlled script in that user's browser context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-25920
- Published
- Mar 27, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- VeronaLabs
- Product
- WP SMS
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 27, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=6.3.4 changes=[{"at":"6.4","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo