Guest execution corruption via injected virtual interrupts
Published May 15, 2024 · Updated Mar 14, 2025
Improper input validation in Linux Kernel through 6.9 allows attackers controlling the hypervisor to corrupt SEV guest execution. The x86 interrupt-entry path accepts injected virtual interrupts 0 and 14 without authenticating their source, invoking exception handlers that alter guest state and can deliver SIGFPE to userspace. Exploitation requires hypervisor control and an AMD SEV-ES or SEV-SNP Linux guest; timed injections can alter application data or control flow.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in Linux Kernel through 6.9 allows attackers controlling the hypervisor to corrupt SEV guest execution. The x86 interrupt-entry path accepts injected virtual interrupts 0 and 14 without authenticating their source, invoking exception handlers that alter guest state and can deliver SIGFPE to userspace. Exploitation requires hypervisor control and an AMD SEV-ES or SEV-SNP Linux guest; timed injections can alter application data or control flow.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-25743
- Published
- May 15, 2024
- Updated
- Mar 14, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-20, T1565.003
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 15, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 14, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=6.9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Heckler proof-of-concept environmentproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo