Service interruption via oversized header canonicalization
Published Feb 14, 2024 · Updated Feb 13, 2025
Denial of service in Squid before 6.5 allows remote attackers to exhaust memory or stall transactions via oversized HTTP headers. Header-list canonicalization can expand received values beyond the 65,535-byte String limit; getList then throws after processReplyHeader allocates a reply, leaking memory, while related paths assert or stall. Default header-size limits leave versions 3.0 through 6.4 exposed; configurations below 21 KB avoid the vulnerable state.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in Squid before 6.5 allows remote attackers to exhaust memory or stall transactions via oversized HTTP headers. Header-list canonicalization can expand received values beyond the 65,535-byte String limit; getList then throws after processReplyHeader allocates a reply, leaking memory, while related paths assert or stall. Default header-size limits leave versions 3.0 through 6.4 exposed; configurations below 21 KB avoid the vulnerable state.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-25617
- Published
- Feb 14, 2024
- Updated
- Feb 13, 2025
- Vendor
- The Squid Software Foundation
- Product
- Squid
- Classifications
- CWE-182, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 14, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 13, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <6.5
- Affected versionversion=< 6.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo