Service crash via recursive chunked-response processing
Published Mar 6, 2024 · Updated Nov 3, 2025
Uncontrolled recursion in Squid 3.5.27 through 6.7 allows remote attackers to crash the proxy via a crafted chunked HTTP response. When the reply buffer is full, HttpStateData::maybeMakeSpaceAvailable calls processReply again through processReplyBody and maybeReadVirginBody instead of ending the transaction. An attacker must induce the proxy to fetch from an attacker-controlled origin; the resulting stack overflow interrupts the Squid service.
Summary
What happened
Uncontrolled recursion in Squid 3.5.27 through 6.7 allows remote attackers to crash the proxy via a crafted chunked HTTP response. When the reply buffer is full, HttpStateData::maybeMakeSpaceAvailable calls processReply again through processReplyBody and maybeReadVirginBody instead of ending the transaction. An attacker must induce the proxy to fetch from an attacker-controlled origin; the resulting stack overflow interrupts the Squid service.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-25111
- Published
- Mar 6, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 3, 2025
- Vendor
- Fedora Project
- Product
- Fedora Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-674, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 6, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 3, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=38
- Affected versionversion=39
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Chunked Encoding Stack Overflow proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo