Remote service crash via unchecked return value
Published Sep 18, 2024 · Updated Sep 18, 2024
NULL pointer dereference in libfluid_msg 0.1.0 allows remote attackers to crash a consuming component through crafted OpenFlow wire data. ActionSet::unpack fails to check a return value before dereferencing the resulting NULL pointer while parsing an OpenFlow message. The library must be embedded in a network-reachable controller or driver that passes attacker-controlled messages to this routine; the documented consequence is service interruption.
Summary
What happened
NULL pointer dereference in libfluid_msg 0.1.0 allows remote attackers to crash a consuming component through crafted OpenFlow wire data. ActionSet::unpack fails to check a return value before dereferencing the resulting NULL pointer while parsing an OpenFlow message. The library must be embedded in a network-reachable controller or driver that passes attacker-controlled messages to this routine; the documented consequence is service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-23916
- Published
- Sep 18, 2024
- Updated
- Sep 18, 2024
- Vendor
- Open Networking Foundation
- Product
- libfluid
- Classifications
- CWE-690, CWE-476, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 18, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 18, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0.1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo