Arbitrary code execution via duplicate stream closure
Published Feb 20, 2024 · Updated Nov 4, 2025
Double-free in libbiosig 2.5.0 and master commit ab0ee111 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted BrainVision header. In sopen_extended, an ASCII header without [Channel Infos] causes ifclose to free a FILE stream that the parser already closed after reading the header. The attacker must cause a consuming application to parse the malicious file; successful heap corruption grants code execution in that process, while failed attempts can crash it.
Summary
What happened
Double-free in libbiosig 2.5.0 and master commit ab0ee111 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted BrainVision header. In sopen_extended, an ASCII header without [Channel Infos] causes ifclose to free a FILE stream that the parser already closed after reading the header. The attacker must cause a consuming application to parse the malicious file; successful heap corruption grants code execution in that process, while failed attempts can crash it.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-23809
- Published
- Feb 20, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2025
- Vendor
- Fedora Project
- Product
- Fedora Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-415, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 20, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=40
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Talos BrainVision ASCII parser proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo