Form duplication via missing nonce validation
Published Jun 5, 2024 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Mollie Forms 2.6.13 and earlier allows remote attackers to duplicate forms through an administrator's browser. The duplicateForm() function accepts a state-changing request without verifying the action nonce, so WordPress treats the forged request as the administrator's action. Exploitation requires an authenticated site administrator to follow an attacker-controlled link, and the resulting integrity impact is limited to form duplication.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Mollie Forms 2.6.13 and earlier allows remote attackers to duplicate forms through an administrator's browser. The duplicateForm() function accepts a state-changing request without verifying the action nonce, so WordPress treats the forged request as the administrator's action. Exploitation requires an authenticated site administrator to follow an attacker-controlled link, and the resulting integrity impact is limited to form duplication.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-2368
- Published
- Jun 5, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Nick van Wobbie
- Product
- Mollie Forms
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 5, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.6.13
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo