Remote code execution via traversed binding path
Published May 16, 2024 · Updated Aug 1, 2024
Path traversal in LoLLMs WebUI allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code through the binding reinstall endpoint. The reinstall_binding handler in lollms_binding_infos.py inadequately sanitizes binding_path, allowing traversal to an attacker-controlled directory whose uploaded init.py is loaded as a binding. Exploitation requires low privileges and user interaction; successful execution runs attacker-supplied Python code on the server.
Summary
What happened
Path traversal in LoLLMs WebUI allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code through the binding reinstall endpoint. The reinstall_binding handler in lollms_binding_infos.py inadequately sanitizes binding_path, allowing traversal to an attacker-controlled directory whose uploaded init.py is loaded as a binding. Exploitation requires low privileges and user interaction; successful execution runs attacker-supplied Python code on the server.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-2366
- Published
- May 16, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 1, 2024
- Vendor
- ParisNeo
- Product
- LoLLMs WebUI
- Classifications
- CWE-77, T1059.006, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 16, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 1, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=-
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <=latest
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- huntr bounty proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo