Memory corruption via unchecked palette-table copy
Published Apr 25, 2024 · Updated Nov 4, 2025
Heap-based buffer overflow in GDCM 3.0.23 allows remote attackers to corrupt memory by supplying a malformed DICOM file. LookupTable::SetLUT copies file-controlled palette bytes into Internal->RGB without ensuring that the metadata-controlled loop bound fits the allocated buffer. Processing requires no authentication or user interaction, and the demonstrated consequence is an out-of-bounds write that corrupts process memory.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in GDCM 3.0.23 allows remote attackers to corrupt memory by supplying a malformed DICOM file. LookupTable::SetLUT copies file-controlled palette bytes into Internal->RGB without ensuring that the metadata-controlled loop bound fits the allocated buffer. Processing requires no authentication or user interaction, and the demonstrated consequence is an out-of-bounds write that corrupts process memory.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-22391
- Published
- Apr 25, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2025
- Vendor
- Grassroots DICOM
- Product
- GDCM
- Classifications
- CWE-787, CWE-119
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 25, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.0.23
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos malformed DICOM proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo