Root command execution via crafted SSH CLI input
Published Oct 23, 2024 · Updated Oct 26, 2024
Command injection in the SSH subsystem of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software allows remote authenticated users to execute OS commands as root. The CiscoSSH stack insufficiently validates crafted input submitted while remote CLI commands are executed over SSH, allowing command delimiters to reach an operating-system command context. Exposure requires a vulnerable release, the CiscoSSH stack, SSH access on an interface, and limited user privileges; successful exploitation grants complete system control.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in the SSH subsystem of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software allows remote authenticated users to execute OS commands as root. The CiscoSSH stack insufficiently validates crafted input submitted while remote CLI commands are executed over SSH, allowing command delimiters to reach an operating-system command context. Exposure requires a vulnerable release, the CiscoSSH stack, SSH access on an interface, and limited user privileges; successful exploitation grants complete system control.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-20329
- Published
- Oct 23, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 26, 2024
- Vendor
- ClamAV
- Product
- Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
- Classifications
- CWE-146, T1059, T1068
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 23, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 26, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.10
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.11
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.13
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.15
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.20
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.30
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.33
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.7
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1.9
- Affected versionversion=9.17.1 <=9.17.1.33
- Affected versionversion=9.18.1
- Affected versionversion=9.18.1.3
- Affected versionversion=9.18.2
- Affected versionversion=9.18.2.5
- Affected versionversion=9.18.2.7
- Affected versionversion=9.18.2.8
- Affected versionversion=9.18.2 <=9.18.2.8
- Affected versionversion=9.18.3
- Affected versionversion=9.18.3.39
- Affected versionversion=9.18.3.46
- Affected versionversion=9.18.3.53
- Affected versionversion=9.18.3.55
- Affected versionversion=9.18.3.56
- Affected versionversion=9.18.3 <=9.18.3.56
- Affected versionversion=9.19.1
- Affected versionversion=9.19.1.12
- Affected versionversion=9.19.1.18
- Affected versionversion=9.19.1.5
- Affected versionversion=9.19.1.9
- Affected versionversion=9.19.1 <=9.19.1.18
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo