Rulebook data exposure via unauthenticated WebSocket
Published Apr 25, 2024 · Updated Feb 25, 2026
Cleartext WebSocket use in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 allows remote authenticated users to read and alter rulebook data. The installer configures activation-to-EDA-server communication over an unauthenticated WebSocket, exposing complete rulebook payloads to hosts inside the configured network range. Access from any machine in the permitted CIDR block is sufficient; the documented impact is rulebook confidentiality and integrity, not service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Cleartext WebSocket use in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 allows remote authenticated users to read and alter rulebook data. The installer configures activation-to-EDA-server communication over an unauthenticated WebSocket, exposing complete rulebook payloads to hosts inside the configured network range. Access from any machine in the permitted CIDR block is sufficient; the documented impact is rulebook confidentiality and integrity, not service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-1657
- Published
- Apr 25, 2024
- Updated
- Feb 25, 2026
- Vendor
- 389 Directory Server
- Product
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
- Classifications
- CWE-319, T1040
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 25, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 25, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo