Secret-length disclosure via early length mismatch return
Published Mar 28, 2025 · Updated Mar 28, 2025
Observable timing discrepancy in String::Compare::ConstantTime through 0.321 allows remote attackers to infer secret-string length via timing. The equals() routine in ConstantTime.xs compares contents only when lengths match and otherwise returns false immediately, making response time reveal whether a candidate length matches the secret. Exposure requires a consuming service to compare attacker-controlled values with a secret and permit repeated measurements; the disclosed result is the secret length, not its contents.
Summary
What happened
Observable timing discrepancy in String::Compare::ConstantTime through 0.321 allows remote attackers to infer secret-string length via timing. The equals() routine in ConstantTime.xs compares contents only when lengths match and otherwise returns false immediately, making response time reveal whether a candidate length matches the secret. Exposure requires a consuming service to compare attacker-controlled values with a secret and permit repeated measurements; the disclosed result is the secret length, not its contents.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-13939
- Published
- Mar 28, 2025
- Updated
- Mar 28, 2025
- Vendor
- Doug Hoyte
- Product
- String::Compare::ConstantTime
- Classifications
- CWE-208
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 28, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 28, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=0.321
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo