Administrator data modification via missing nonce validation
Published Feb 25, 2025 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
CSRF in Iptanus File Upload 4.25.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify uploaded-file user data via a forged request. The wfu_file_details path accepts a file-details edit without validating a WordPress nonce, allowing the request to change data associated with an uploaded file. Exploitation requires a site administrator with an active session to perform an attacker-induced action, and the documented consequence is limited to integrity of the associated user data.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in Iptanus File Upload 4.25.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify uploaded-file user data via a forged request. The wfu_file_details path accepts a file-details edit without validating a WordPress nonce, allowing the request to change data associated with an uploaded file. Exploitation requires a site administrator with an active session to perform an attacker-induced action, and the documented consequence is limited to integrity of the associated user data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-13494
- Published
- Feb 25, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Iptanus
- Product
- Iptanus File Upload
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 25, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=4.25.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo