Administrator-session script execution via unescaped parameter
Published Jan 31, 2025 · Updated Mar 13, 2025
Reflected cross-site scripting in WP MediaTagger 4.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to run scripts in an administrator's browser. WPScan reports that an unspecified request parameter is returned in a page without sanitization or output escaping; no public source names the parameter or code locus. Exploitation requires a high-privilege user to follow an attacker-controlled request, after which the script can act within that user's WordPress session.
Summary
What happened
Reflected cross-site scripting in WP MediaTagger 4.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to run scripts in an administrator's browser. WPScan reports that an unspecified request parameter is returned in a page without sanitization or output escaping; no public source names the parameter or code locus. Exploitation requires a high-privilege user to follow an attacker-controlled request, after which the script can act within that user's WordPress session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-13112
- Published
- Jan 31, 2025
- Updated
- Mar 13, 2025
- Vendor
- phd38
- Product
- WP MediaTagger
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 31, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 13, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=4.1.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- WPScan reflected-XSS proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo