Database query manipulation via unsanitized sids input
Published Dec 31, 2024 · Updated Dec 31, 2024
SQL injection in 1000 Projects Beauty Parlour Management System 1.0 allows remote authenticated users to manipulate database queries. The Customer Detail Handler passes each sids[] POST value from /admin/add-customer-services.php directly into an SQL statement without parameterization or sanitization. Low-privileged access to the admin handler is sufficient to inject time-based queries, enabling database reads or modifications and service degradation within the database account's permissions.
Summary
What happened
SQL injection in 1000 Projects Beauty Parlour Management System 1.0 allows remote authenticated users to manipulate database queries. The Customer Detail Handler passes each sids[] POST value from /admin/add-customer-services.php directly into an SQL statement without parameterization or sanitization. Low-privileged access to the admin handler is sufficient to inject time-based queries, enabling database reads or modifications and service degradation within the database account's permissions.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-13072
- Published
- Dec 31, 2024
- Updated
- Dec 31, 2024
- Vendor
- 1000 Projects
- Product
- Beauty Parlour Management System
- Classifications
- CWE-89, CWE-74, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 31, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 31, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- SQL Injection in Beauty Parlour Management System proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo