Database read and modification via unsanitized e_id
Published Dec 29, 2024 · Updated Dec 31, 2024
SQL injection in Portfolio Management System MCA 1.0 allows remote attackers to read and modify database data through crafted e_id input. update_ed.php passes the multipart POST parameter e_id directly into SQL statements without adequate validation, sanitization, or parameter binding. Published assessments conflict on the gate: the CNA requires low privileges, the NVD score requires none, and the proof of concept states no authentication.
Summary
What happened
SQL injection in Portfolio Management System MCA 1.0 allows remote attackers to read and modify database data through crafted e_id input. update_ed.php passes the multipart POST parameter e_id directly into SQL statements without adequate validation, sanitization, or parameter binding. Published assessments conflict on the gate: the CNA requires low privileges, the NVD score requires none, and the proof of concept states no authentication.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-13003
- Published
- Dec 29, 2024
- Updated
- Dec 31, 2024
- Vendor
- 1000 Projects
- Product
- Portfolio Management System MCA
- Classifications
- CWE-89, CWE-74, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 29, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 31, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- SQL Injection in Portfolio Management System proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo