Local contact-data alteration via unvalidated add input
Published Dec 9, 2024 · Updated Dec 12, 2024
Improper input validation in SourceCodester Phone Contact Manager System 1.0 allows local users to alter contact data through an add-contact workflow. ContactBook::adding in ContactBook.cpp accepts manipulated input without adequate validation, but published records omit the rejected property and exact write operation. Access requires a local authenticated session, and the CNA bounds the reported effect to reduced integrity rather than disclosure or service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in SourceCodester Phone Contact Manager System 1.0 allows local users to alter contact data through an add-contact workflow. ContactBook::adding in ContactBook.cpp accepts manipulated input without adequate validation, but published records omit the rejected property and exact write operation. Access requires a local authenticated session, and the CNA bounds the reported effect to reduced integrity rather than disclosure or service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-12355
- Published
- Dec 9, 2024
- Updated
- Dec 12, 2024
- Vendor
- Online Computer and Laptop Store Project
- Product
- Phone Contact Manager System
- Classifications
- CWE-20
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 9, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 12, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- BOF2.md proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo