Restricted field modification via client-controlled attributes
Published Nov 6, 2025 · Updated Dec 24, 2025
Improper permission preservation in Red Hat 3scale Developer Portal before 2.16 allows remote attackers to modify restricted account fields. Account creation and update handling trusts client-submitted values for attributes that the UI marks read-only or hidden instead of enforcing those restrictions server-side. An unauthenticated network request is sufficient, and the bounded consequence is unauthorized modification of restricted account information.
Summary
What happened
Improper permission preservation in Red Hat 3scale Developer Portal before 2.16 allows remote attackers to modify restricted account fields. Account creation and update handling trusts client-submitted values for attributes that the UI marks read-only or hidden instead of enforcing those restrictions server-side. An unauthenticated network request is sufficient, and the bounded consequence is unauthorized modification of restricted account information.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-12125
- Published
- Nov 6, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 24, 2025
- Vendor
- 389 Directory Server
- Product
- Porta
- Classifications
- CWE-281
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 6, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 24, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <3scale-2.16.0-GA
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo