Arbitrary code execution via memory corruption
Published Nov 26, 2024 · Updated Nov 3, 2025
Memory-safety defects in Mozilla Firefox before 133, Firefox ESR before 128.5, and Thunderbird before 133 allow remote attackers to execute code. Mozilla identifies the locus only as multiple memory-safety bugs; public advisories do not disclose the affected functions or faulty operations. Exploitation requires user interaction with attacker-controlled web content; Thunderbird mail reading disables scripting, limiting exposure to browser-like contexts.
Summary
What happened
Memory-safety defects in Mozilla Firefox before 133, Firefox ESR before 128.5, and Thunderbird before 133 allow remote attackers to execute code. Mozilla identifies the locus only as multiple memory-safety bugs; public advisories do not disclose the affected functions or faulty operations. Exploitation requires user interaction with attacker-controlled web content; Thunderbird mail reading disables scripting, limiting exposure to browser-like contexts.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-11699
- Published
- Nov 26, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 3, 2025
- Vendor
- Mozilla
- Product
- Firefox
- Classifications
- CWE-120, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 26, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 3, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <133
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <133
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo