Authenticated model-setting tampering via missing admin check
Published Mar 20, 2025 · Updated Mar 20, 2025
Incorrect authorization in Mintplex Labs AnythingLLM before 1.3.1 allows remote authenticated users to alter model settings via an API request. The POST /api/system/custom-models route accepted any validated request and wrote provider, API-key, and base-path values without enforcing the administrator role. In multi-user Docker deployments, a low-privilege account can replace model credentials or routing data, expose API keys, and interrupt chats.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect authorization in Mintplex Labs AnythingLLM before 1.3.1 allows remote authenticated users to alter model settings via an API request. The POST /api/system/custom-models route accepted any validated request and wrote provider, API-key, and base-path values without enforcing the administrator role. In multi-user Docker deployments, a low-privilege account can replace model credentials or routing data, expose API keys, and interrupt chats.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-10109
- Published
- Mar 20, 2025
- Updated
- Mar 20, 2025
- Vendor
- Mintplex Labs
- Product
- AnythingLLM
- Classifications
- CWE-863
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 20, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 20, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <1.3.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Huntr custom-models authorization-bypass proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo