Local denial of service via interrupt-unsafe locking
Published Jan 17, 2024 · Updated Nov 20, 2025
Deadlock in the Linux Kernel TIPC subsystem before 6.6-rc5 allows local users to hang or crash the host during key revocation. tipc_crypto_key_revoke() acquires tx->lock without disabling bottom halves, allowing a timer or receive softirq callback to enter the same path and spin on the already-held lock. Reachability requires local low-privilege access and an active TIPC encryption or authentication key-revocation path; the bounded consequence is host unavailability.
Summary
What happened
Deadlock in the Linux Kernel TIPC subsystem before 6.6-rc5 allows local users to hang or crash the host during key revocation. tipc_crypto_key_revoke() acquires tx->lock without disabling bottom halves, allowing a timer or receive softirq callback to enter the same path and spin on the already-held lock. Reachability requires local low-privilege access and an active TIPC encryption or authentication key-revocation path; the bounded consequence is host unavailability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-0641
- Published
- Jan 17, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 20, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-667, CWE-833, CAPEC-25, T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 17, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 20, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <6.6-rc5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo