Database data extraction via unescaped id query
Published Jan 16, 2024 · Updated Jun 11, 2025
SQL injection in ArtPlacer Widget before 2.20.7 allows remote authenticated users with Editor access to read WordPress database data. The edit-art-placer administration page submits its id parameter in an existing SQL query without sanitization, escaping, or sufficient preparation. Editor access is normally required, but a missing CSRF check also lets attackers induce a logged-in Editor to issue the crafted request; the published proof of concept demonstrates time-based query execution.
Summary
What happened
SQL injection in ArtPlacer Widget before 2.20.7 allows remote authenticated users with Editor access to read WordPress database data. The edit-art-placer administration page submits its id parameter in an existing SQL query without sanitization, escaping, or sufficient preparation. Editor access is normally required, but a missing CSRF check also lets attackers induce a logged-in Editor to issue the crafted request; the published proof of concept demonstrates time-based query execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-6373
- Published
- Jan 16, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 11, 2025
- Vendor
- ArtPlacer
- Product
- ArtPlacer Widget
- Classifications
- CWE-89, CWE-352, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 16, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 11, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2.20.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- WPScan Editor SQL injection proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo