Code execution via incomplete seccomp sandbox
Published Oct 13, 2023 · Updated Nov 20, 2025
Protection mechanism failure in tracker-miners on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and 9 allows attackers to escape the seccomp sandbox. The tracker-extract seccomp policy permits an undisclosed syscall path that fails to confine code already running after a separate compromise. Exploitation requires user interaction with a malicious file and prior compromise of tracker-extract; escaped code runs with the current user's privileges.
Summary
What happened
Protection mechanism failure in tracker-miners on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and 9 allows attackers to escape the seccomp sandbox. The tracker-extract seccomp policy permits an undisclosed syscall path that fails to confine code already running after a separate compromise. Exploitation requires user interaction with a malicious file and prior compromise of tracker-extract; escaped code runs with the current user's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-5557
- Published
- Oct 13, 2023
- Updated
- Nov 20, 2025
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
- Classifications
- CWE-693, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 13, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 20, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GNOME one-click code-execution demonstrationfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo