Unauthenticated command execution via unbounded XML tag copy
Published Jan 13, 2026 · Updated Jan 13, 2026
Stack-based buffer overflow in Inbit Messenger 4.6.0 through 4.9.0 allows remote attackers to execute commands via TCP port 10883. IMS.EXE copies bytes from the opening tag of its custom XML-like protocol into a 48-byte stack buffer without enforcing a bound, allowing an overwritten function pointer to redirect execution to WinExec. The server accepts the packet before authentication; successful exploitation runs commands with the server process's system privileges and then crashes the process.
Summary
What happened
Stack-based buffer overflow in Inbit Messenger 4.6.0 through 4.9.0 allows remote attackers to execute commands via TCP port 10883. IMS.EXE copies bytes from the opening tag of its custom XML-like protocol into a 48-byte stack buffer without enforcing a bound, allowing an overwritten function pointer to redirect execution to WinExec. The server accepts the packet before authentication; successful exploitation runs commands with the server process's system privileges and then crashes the process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-54329
- Published
- Jan 13, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 13, 2026
- Vendor
- Inbit Incorporated
- Product
- Inbit Messenger
- Classifications
- CWE-787, CWE-121, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4.6.0 <=4.9.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Inbit Messenger v4.9.0 Unauthenticated Remote Command Executionfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo