Service interruption via unreleased CoreSight ACPI buffers
Published Sep 15, 2025 · Updated Sep 15, 2025
Memory leak in Linux kernel 5.3 through 6.5.2 allows local users to interrupt service through CoreSight ACPI graph parsing. acpi_get_dsd_graph returns without releasing buf.pointer because later parsing still uses the allocation, leaving each ACPI buffer stranded. Reachability requires local access and a CoreSight ACPI graph; repeated allocations consume kernel memory without affecting confidentiality or integrity.
Summary
What happened
Memory leak in Linux kernel 5.3 through 6.5.2 allows local users to interrupt service through CoreSight ACPI graph parsing. acpi_get_dsd_graph returns without releasing buf.pointer because later parsing still uses the allocation, leaving each ACPI buffer stranded. Reachability requires local access and a CoreSight ACPI graph; repeated allocations consume kernel memory without affecting confidentiality or integrity.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-53261
- Published
- Sep 15, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 15, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-401
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 15, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.3
- Affected versionversion=76ffa5ab5b79c250b9744b7f8bdd835db426a1ae <1a9e02673e2550f5612099e64e8761f0c8fc0f50
- Affected versionversion=76ffa5ab5b79c250b9744b7f8bdd835db426a1ae <d1b60e7c9fee34eaedf1fc4e0471f75b33f83a4a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo