Kernel warning via incorrect BPF lock assertion
Published Mar 26, 2024 · Updated May 11, 2026
Improper lock-state validation in the Linux kernel allows local users to trigger a kernel warning through a sleepable BPF program. The bpf_map_lookup_elem, bpf_map_update_elem, and bpf_map_delete_elem helpers accept sleepable programs but test only ordinary RCU lock state, incorrectly rejecting the held RCU Tasks Trace lock. The condition requires BPF interpreter mode with bpf_jit_enable set to 0 and sufficient privileges to load and run the program; the published reproducer reports a warning rather than a confirmed crash.
Summary
What happened
Improper lock-state validation in the Linux kernel allows local users to trigger a kernel warning through a sleepable BPF program. The bpf_map_lookup_elem, bpf_map_update_elem, and bpf_map_delete_elem helpers accept sleepable programs but test only ordinary RCU lock state, incorrectly rejecting the held RCU Tasks Trace lock. The condition requires BPF interpreter mode with bpf_jit_enable set to 0 and sufficient privileges to load and run the program; the published reproducer reports a warning rather than a confirmed crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-52621
- Published
- Mar 26, 2024
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- Unavailable
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 26, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1e6c62a8821557720a9b2ea9617359b264f2f67c <169410eba271afc9f0fb476d996795aa26770c6d
- Affected versionversion=1e6c62a8821557720a9b2ea9617359b264f2f67c <3516f93cc63d956e1b290ae4b7bf2586074535a0
- Affected versionversion=1e6c62a8821557720a9b2ea9617359b264f2f67c <483cb92334cd7f1d5387dccc0ab5d595d27a669d
- Affected versionversion=1e6c62a8821557720a9b2ea9617359b264f2f67c <82f2df94dac1aa9b879e74d1f82ba1b631bdc612
- Affected versionversion=1e6c62a8821557720a9b2ea9617359b264f2f67c <c7f1b6146f4a46d727c0d046284c28b6882c6304
- Affected versionversion=1e6c62a8821557720a9b2ea9617359b264f2f67c <d6d6fe4bb105595118f12abeed4a7bdd450853f3
- Affected versionversion=5.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
No sourced classifications are available.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo