Unauthenticated RAID modification and system-file access
Published Jan 9, 2024 · Updated May 22, 2025
Improper input validation in maxView Storage Manager on affected SIMATIC IPCs allows remote attackers to gain unauthorized Redfish access. The Redfish server fails to validate unspecified request input, but Siemens and Microchip have not disclosed the affected handler or exact validation error. The server must be configured for remote management; access permits known-path system-file reads and RAID changes that can cause data loss.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in maxView Storage Manager on affected SIMATIC IPCs allows remote attackers to gain unauthorized Redfish access. The Redfish server fails to validate unspecified request input, but Siemens and Microchip have not disclosed the affected handler or exact validation error. The server must be configured for remote management; access permits known-path system-file reads and RAID changes that can cause data loss.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-51438
- Published
- Jan 9, 2024
- Updated
- May 22, 2025
- Vendor
- Siemens
- Product
- SIMATIC IPC847E
- Classifications
- CWE-20, T1485, T1190, T1005
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 9, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 22, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=All versions with maxView Storage Manager < V4.14.00.26068 on Windows
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo