Template deletion via CSRF and missing authorization
Published Mar 15, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Missing authorization and CSRF in wpWax Legal Pages 1.3.7 and earlier allow attackers to delete stored legal templates. The deleteLegalTemplate() function performs deletion without a capability check; the published record does not identify the CSRF request locus. Direct exploitation requires subscriber-level access, while the CSRF path requires an authorized user to act on a crafted request; the documented consequence is template deletion.
Summary
What happened
Missing authorization and CSRF in wpWax Legal Pages 1.3.7 and earlier allow attackers to delete stored legal templates. The deleteLegalTemplate() function performs deletion without a capability check; the published record does not identify the CSRF request locus. Direct exploitation requires subscriber-level access, while the CSRF path requires an authorized user to act on a crafted request; the documented consequence is template deletion.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-50886
- Published
- Mar 15, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- wpWax
- Product
- Legal Pages
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CWE-863, T1485
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 15, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=1.3.7 changes=[{"at":"1.3.8","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo