Unauthenticated document modification via missing capability checks
Published Jan 2, 2025 · Updated Apr 29, 2026
Missing authorization in Spider Themes EazyDocs 2.3.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to publish or edit OnePage documents. The doc_one_page and edit_doc_one_page functions accept unauthenticated requests without a capability check before modifying the plugin's OnePage content. No WordPress account or user interaction is required, and successful exploitation changes published documentation rather than exposing stored data.
Summary
What happened
Missing authorization in Spider Themes EazyDocs 2.3.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to publish or edit OnePage documents. The doc_one_page and edit_doc_one_page functions accept unauthenticated requests without a capability check before modifying the plugin's OnePage content. No WordPress account or user interaction is required, and successful exploitation changes published documentation rather than exposing stored data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-47648
- Published
- Jan 2, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- Vendor
- Spider Themes
- Product
- EazyDocs
- Classifications
- CWE-862, CAPEC-180, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 2, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 29, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.3.5 changes=[{"at":"2.3.6","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo