Root code execution via EmailTo command injection
Published May 3, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Command injection in D-Link DIR-X3260 1.02B02 allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code as root through HNAP requests. The SetSysEmailSettings handler in prog.cgi passes an unvalidated EmailTo string into a system call received by lighttpd on TCP ports 80 and 443. Reaching the operation requires authentication, but the router's existing authentication mechanism is separately bypassable, leaving adjacent networks exposed to full device compromise.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in D-Link DIR-X3260 1.02B02 allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code as root through HNAP requests. The SetSysEmailSettings handler in prog.cgi passes an unvalidated EmailTo string into a system call received by lighttpd on TCP ports 80 and 443. Reaching the operation requires authentication, but the router's existing authentication mechanism is separately bypassable, leaving adjacent networks exposed to full device compromise.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-44424
- Published
- May 3, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- D-Link
- Product
- DIR-X3260 Firmware
- Classifications
- CWE-78, T1210
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 3, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=-
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo