Local code execution via XCreateImage overflow
Published Oct 10, 2023 · Updated Nov 6, 2025
Heap-based buffer overflow in X.Org libX11 before 1.8.7 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via crafted XPM image input. XCreateImage multiplies caller-supplied width by bits_per_pixel without overflow validation, allocates a buffer that is too small, and then copies image data into it. Exploitation requires local access and user interaction through an application that loads the malicious image; successful corruption can provide code execution with elevated privileges.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in X.Org libX11 before 1.8.7 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via crafted XPM image input. XCreateImage multiplies caller-supplied width by bits_per_pixel without overflow validation, allocates a buffer that is too small, and then copies image data into it. Exploitation requires local access and user interaction through an application that loads the malicious image; successful corruption can provide code execution with elevated privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-43787
- Published
- Oct 10, 2023
- Updated
- Nov 6, 2025
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Classifications
- CWE-122, T1203, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 10, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 6, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo