Code execution via undersized LXT2 lsb allocation
Published Jan 8, 2024 · Updated Nov 4, 2025
Integer overflow in GTKWave 3.3.115 LXT2 facgeometry parsing allows attackers to execute arbitrary code through a crafted .lxt2 file. In 32-bit mode, lxt2_rd_init multiplies the file-supplied numfacs value by four without overflow validation, underallocating the lsb array before a numfacs-sized loop writes beyond it. Opening the file in the GUI or an affected LXT2 utility triggers heap corruption that can overwrite pointers and redirect writes to attacker-chosen addresses.
Summary
What happened
Integer overflow in GTKWave 3.3.115 LXT2 facgeometry parsing allows attackers to execute arbitrary code through a crafted .lxt2 file. In 32-bit mode, lxt2_rd_init multiplies the file-supplied numfacs value by four without overflow validation, underallocating the lsb array before a numfacs-sized loop writes beyond it. Opening the file in the GUI or an affected LXT2 utility triggers heap corruption that can overwrite pointers and redirect writes to attacker-chosen addresses.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-39272
- Published
- Jan 8, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2025
- Vendor
- GTKWave
- Product
- GTKWave
- Classifications
- CWE-190, T1203, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 8, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.3.115
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos heap-buffer-overflow demonstrationproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo