Code execution via undersized msb array allocation
Published Jan 8, 2024 · Updated Nov 4, 2025
Integer overflow in GTKWave 3.3.115 LXT2 parsing allows attackers to execute arbitrary code through a crafted file. In 32-bit mode, lxt2_rd_init multiplies attacker-controlled numfacs by the msb element size without overflow checking, allocates a too-small heap buffer, and writes numfacs entries past it. Opening the file in the GUI or processing it with an affected LXT2 utility is required, and the resulting heap corruption can overwrite pointers and run code in the current process.
Summary
What happened
Integer overflow in GTKWave 3.3.115 LXT2 parsing allows attackers to execute arbitrary code through a crafted file. In 32-bit mode, lxt2_rd_init multiplies attacker-controlled numfacs by the msb element size without overflow checking, allocates a too-small heap buffer, and writes numfacs entries past it. Opening the file in the GUI or processing it with an affected LXT2 utility is required, and the resulting heap corruption can overwrite pointers and run code in the current process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-39271
- Published
- Jan 8, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2025
- Vendor
- GTKWave
- Product
- GTKWave
- Classifications
- CWE-190, T1204.002, T1203
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 8, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.3.115
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo