Arbitrary code execution via freed signature object
Published Nov 27, 2023 · Updated Nov 4, 2025
Use-after-free in Foxit PDF Reader 12.1.3.15356 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malicious PDF signature field. The signature field OnBlur callback invokes deletePages(), freeing its signature object, and Foxit later dereferences that object without validation. Exploitation requires opening the crafted PDF or visiting a malicious site with the browser plugin enabled; successful memory manipulation gains code execution in the reader process.
Summary
What happened
Use-after-free in Foxit PDF Reader 12.1.3.15356 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malicious PDF signature field. The signature field OnBlur callback invokes deletePages(), freeing its signature object, and Foxit later dereferences that object without validation. Exploitation requires opening the crafted PDF or visiting a malicious site with the browser plugin enabled; successful memory manipulation gains code execution in the reader process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-38573
- Published
- Nov 27, 2023
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2025
- Vendor
- Foxit Software
- Product
- Foxit PDF Reader
- Classifications
- CWE-416, T1204.002, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 27, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=12.1.3.15356
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos signature-field JavaScript proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo