HTTP request smuggling via misparsed header carriage return
Published Jul 19, 2023 · Updated Oct 18, 2024
HTTP request smuggling in aiohttp 3.8.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter server request parsing via crafted headers. The bundled llhttp 6.0.6 parser treats a carriage return inside a header value as a boundary, promoting trailing bytes into a Transfer-Encoding header. Exposure requires aiohttp.Application server use with the compiled parser, the default for wheel installations; client-only and pure-Python deployments are unaffected.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in aiohttp 3.8.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter server request parsing via crafted headers. The bundled llhttp 6.0.6 parser treats a carriage return inside a header value as a boundary, promoting trailing bytes into a Transfer-Encoding header. Exposure requires aiohttp.Application server use with the compiled parser, the default for wheel installations; client-only and pure-Python deployments are unaffected.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-37276
- Published
- Jul 19, 2023
- Updated
- Oct 18, 2024
- Vendor
- aio-libs
- Product
- aiohttp
- Classifications
- CWE-444, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 19, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 18, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <3.8.5
- Affected versionversion=< 3.8.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Upstream crafted-header reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo