Account takeover via mismatched SSO session binding
Published Jul 14, 2023 · Updated Oct 18, 2024
Improper authentication in Warptech Industries Warpgate before 0.7.3 allows remote authenticated users to assume another user's session. The SSO callback validated a returned credential for one username but added it to preexisting login state without verifying that the state's username matched. Exploitation requires an attacker account, a victim username, successful attacker SSO authentication, and a victim account without a second factor.
Summary
What happened
Improper authentication in Warptech Industries Warpgate before 0.7.3 allows remote authenticated users to assume another user's session. The SSO callback validated a returned credential for one username but added it to preexisting login state without verifying that the state's username matched. Exploitation requires an attacker account, a victim username, successful attacker SSO authentication, and a victim account without a second factor.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-37268
- Published
- Jul 14, 2023
- Updated
- Oct 18, 2024
- Vendor
- Warptech Industries
- Product
- Warpgate
- Classifications
- CWE-287, T1078
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 14, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 18, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <0.7.3
- Affected versionversion=< 0.7.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- GHSA SSO account-confusion reproduction procedureproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo