Code execution via PDF addIcon type confusion
Published Aug 21, 2023 · Updated Aug 10, 2026
Type confusion in Microsoft Edge before 116.0.1938.54 allows remote attackers to corrupt memory through a crafted PDF document. The Acrobat-based MSDCPDF engine's JavaScript addIcon function accepts a field object as an icon because native argument validation fails, then dereferences an unexpected pointer. Exploitation requires a user to open the malicious PDF in Edge and can produce attacker-influenced memory writes, a browser crash, or code execution.
Summary
What happened
Type confusion in Microsoft Edge before 116.0.1938.54 allows remote attackers to corrupt memory through a crafted PDF document. The Acrobat-based MSDCPDF engine's JavaScript addIcon function accepts a field object as an icon because native argument validation fails, then dereferences an unexpected pointer. Exploitation requires a user to open the malicious PDF in Edge and can produce attacker-influenced memory writes, a browser crash, or code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-36787
- Published
- Aug 21, 2023
- Updated
- Aug 10, 2026
- Vendor
- Microsoft
- Product
- Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based)
- Classifications
- CWE-843, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 21, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0.0.0 <116.0.1938.54
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos addIcon crafted-PDF proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo