Invalid topic titles via skipped category-change validation
Published Jul 14, 2023 · Updated Oct 22, 2024
Improper input validation in Discourse allows remote authenticated users to save invalid topic titles during category changes. The topic edit path changes the category without running the Topic model's title validators, bypassing length, emoji-count, and presence checks. An account permitted to edit and recategorize a topic can persist a blank, overlength, or emoji-heavy title, compromising topic integrity.
Summary
What happened
Improper input validation in Discourse allows remote authenticated users to save invalid topic titles during category changes. The topic edit path changes the category without running the Topic model's title validators, bypassing length, emoji-count, and presence checks. An account permitted to edit and recategorize a topic can persist a blank, overlength, or emoji-heavy title, compromising topic integrity.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-36466
- Published
- Jul 14, 2023
- Updated
- Oct 22, 2024
- Vendor
- Discourse
- Product
- Discourse
- Classifications
- CWE-20, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 14, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 22, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=beta < 3.1.0.beta6
- Affected versionversion=stable < 3.0.5
- Affected versionversion=tests-passed < 3.1.0.beta6
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo