Code execution via wrapped LXT2 block allocation
Published Jan 8, 2024 · Updated Nov 4, 2025
Integer overflow in GTKWave 3.3.115 allows context-dependent attackers to execute code through a crafted LXT2 waveform file. In lxt2_rd_iter_blocks, the parser doubles the attacker-controlled 32-bit clen value into zlen; 0x80000000 wraps the allocation size to zero, yet fread copies clen bytes into the resulting one-byte zbuff buffer. Opening the malicious file is required, and the resulting controlled out-of-bounds heap write permits code execution with the victim process's privileges.
Summary
What happened
Integer overflow in GTKWave 3.3.115 allows context-dependent attackers to execute code through a crafted LXT2 waveform file. In lxt2_rd_iter_blocks, the parser doubles the attacker-controlled 32-bit clen value into zlen; 0x80000000 wraps the allocation size to zero, yet fread copies clen bytes into the resulting one-byte zbuff buffer. Opening the malicious file is required, and the resulting controlled out-of-bounds heap write permits code execution with the victim process's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-35989
- Published
- Jan 8, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 4, 2025
- Vendor
- GTKWave
- Product
- GTKWave
- Classifications
- CWE-190, T1203
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 8, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 4, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.3.115
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos LXT2 block proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo