Plugin data deletion via forged privileged-user requests
Published Jun 19, 2023 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
CSRF in Dylan James Zephyr Project Manager 3.3.93 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete plugin data through forged requests. The advanced-settings action processes a state-changing deletion request without verifying that it originated from the logged-in user. A privileged WordPress user must visit attacker-controlled content, allowing the browser to submit the unwanted action with that user's session.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in Dylan James Zephyr Project Manager 3.3.93 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete plugin data through forged requests. The advanced-settings action processes a state-changing deletion request without verifying that it originated from the logged-in user. A privileged WordPress user must visit attacker-controlled content, allowing the browser to submit the unwanted action with that user's session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-34373
- Published
- Jun 19, 2023
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Dylan James
- Product
- Zephyr Project Manager
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 19, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=3.3.93 changes=[{"at":"3.3.94","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo