Private-key extraction via repeated signature aborts
Published Aug 9, 2023 · Updated Oct 10, 2024
Private-key exfiltration in Lindell17 TSS wallets allows remote authenticated users to recover an ECDSA key through repeated signing. A malicious protocol party submits crafted Paillier ciphertexts whose signature validity reveals one private-key-share bit, while implementations continue after failed signatures instead of terminating. Compromise of one signing party and roughly 200 to 256 signing attempts expose the full key, enabling forged signatures and theft of wallet funds.
Summary
What happened
Private-key exfiltration in Lindell17 TSS wallets allows remote authenticated users to recover an ECDSA key through repeated signing. A malicious protocol party submits crafted Paillier ciphertexts whose signature validity reveals one private-key-share bit, while implementations continue after failed signatures instead of terminating. Compromise of one signing party and roughly 200 to 256 signing attempts expose the full key, enabling forged signatures and theft of wallet funds.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-33242
- Published
- Aug 9, 2023
- Updated
- Oct 10, 2024
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-74, CAPEC-474, T1552.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 9, 2023CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 10, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- ZenGo Lindell17 Exploit PoCfunctional · validated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo