Unauthorized appointment creation via missing ownership checks
Published Jul 9, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Broken object-level authorization in Easy!Appointments before 1.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to create appointments for any user. The POST /appointments API endpoint accepts user-controlled ownership fields without verifying that the caller is authorized for the referenced user. Any low-privileged logged-in role can therefore insert appointment records under another user, including an administrator, causing unauthorized scheduling-data writes.
Summary
What happened
Broken object-level authorization in Easy!Appointments before 1.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to create appointments for any user. The POST /appointments API endpoint accepts user-controlled ownership fields without verifying that the caller is authorized for the referenced user. Any low-privileged logged-in role can therefore insert appointment records under another user, including an administrator, causing unauthorized scheduling-data writes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2023-3285
- Published
- Jul 9, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Alex Tselegidis
- Product
- Easy!Appointments
- Classifications
- CWE-639, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 9, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <1.5.0
- Affected versionversion=* <1.5.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo